Things I Like to Say

I find myself repeating certain things, so here is a collection of some of them.


There are problems on both sides: There are bad people on the right and there are bad people in America.

The Left Can't Discern

Conservatism is a relative position, always defending the ideology that last overtook it.

When anyone accuses another person of propagating right-wing talking points, it's because they can't accuse that person of lying.

Black Lives Matter has almost nothing to do with people of Sub-Saharan descent.

Libertarian = Libertine + Contrarian

Feminism is every negative stereotype about women channeled into a political movement. 

1. Democrats accuse Republicans of things they do themselves.
2. Democrats accuse Republicans of letting Americans die to hold onto power.

On "cultural appropriation": The Left doesn't disapprove of miscegenation, per se, just all of the things that lead up to it.

If you wish to criticize the narrative, the price for a seat at the table is affirmation of the narrative. 

Democracy and populism are two words we give to the same phenomenon depending on how we feel about it.

And on that note... The only thing separating treason from revolution is who wins.

1. White suburban women are the target demographic for politics.
2. You don't appeal to white suburban women by appealing to white suburban women.

Picking leaders based on who you'd most like to have a beer with, invite over for dinner, intercede with the creator on your behalf, or bang is doing it wrong.

In 2020, Democrats gave voters the choice between an angry, addled, lazy, lying, treacherous, self-serving, quarrelsome, foul-mouthed, racist, sexist, bigoted, narcissistic, septuagenarian old white man and Donald Trump.

Democracy, as defined by Democrats:
de·moc·ra·cy / dɪˈmɒk rə si / (noun)
  1. government by Democrats; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the Democratic Party
  2. a state having such a government:
    “The United States is a democracy.”
Todd of Mischief's 1st Political Law: if it makes Progressives think about race, it's Racist

Todd of Mischief's 2nd Political Law: There is no way to craft a sentence so well it can't be distorted into its opposite meaning by a Progressive.


Ayechtsheauxhallaieey…

Any pizza is a personal pizza, if you believe in yourself.

The first liar doesn't stand a chance.

There is no such thing as multi-tasking, just doing everything wrong all at once.

If your solution only works when everyone is on board, it doesn't. 

The confusion you’re experiencing is your assumption being wrong.

I am the center of the universe and I can prove it! You see, I’m right here, and  e v e r y t h i n g  else is around me.

There is a natural tension between wanting a job done right and wanting someone else to do it.

Some people care more about table manners than whether there is food on the table.

I know you believe you understand what you think I said, however I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.





“If you are authoritarian, you have to have a system supporting you. You cannot just be an authoritarian by yourself." 
— Ai Weiwei, Chinese artist and activist critical of the Chinese Government

I also like to keep this handy: YOU ARE STILL CRYING WOLF BY SCOTT ALEXANDER

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story ...
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interv...
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e...
Read more