Politics should be ugly,

 Politics should be ugly, because elections and policy debates are proxies for civil war.

The desire for cordial politics is, in effect, the desire for someone to shut up, give up, and give in. The most affable bickering is still bickering, and it’s the bickering that people complain most about.

The entire PC-SJW-CRT project is couched in “politeness.” HA! Yeah, polite in the way one is polite to goons enforcing a protection racket. “Respect my pronouns or I’ll rain unholy hell upon your house! What? You got a problem with COMMON DECENCY!?!?”

When politics ceases to be an outlet for frustrations, at the same time that politics takes over EVERYTHING—that is, all other outlets—that’s a problem.

Either the decorum crowd is too dumb to recognize this, or they’re not as opposed to physical violence as they claim.

The problem with Hanlon’s Razor is that attribution has no bearing on outcomes. Worse, most people would rather be thought of as malicious than stupid.

Comments

  1. ArgentGaleJune 4, 2021 at 5:19 PM

    That sums it all up perfectly. It's like they think they're running a Xanatos Gambit with this constant browbeating, cancel culture, and constantly bringing their institutional power to bear against the dissidents and apostates. If they get absolute submission from a broken populace, Mission Accomplished. If someone finally snaps in such a way that validates their narratives then it'll prove to the public that they were 100% right about those Evil Reich Wingers and thus they'll join in on purging the unclean, leading to Mission Accomplished. Or at the very least they'll knock America off its superpower pedestal and clear the way for a more enlightened superpower like China. That none of these are likely to go the way they think it will doesn't even occur to them, though admittedly I'm still not so sure that most people won't choose submission over resistance. Either way I'm just tired of this crap.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story ...
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interv...
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e...
Read more