We are almost certainly overreacting to COVID-19

Public policy is only as good as public compliance. I suspect govts have recommended about twice as much as what needs to be done because they expect people will do about half of what they are told to do.

Do I think this is good policy? Absolutely not! It undermines long-term trust for short-term results. I also think it has resulted in a caution-spiral. But it does mean that you can relax a bit when people around you don't follow the rules to the letter.

This bungled policy approach has led us to a strange place where officials are urging the public to get a vaccine that they (the officials) say is ineffective. But the public doesn't dare repeat what officials say about the vaccine. That would be anti-vax conspiracy stuff.

Comments

  1. ArgentGaleApril 20, 2021 at 3:17 PM

    Sorry I missed this post but it's another good one. I'm not sure that they care about long-term trust anymore since everything about Winnie the Flu is being used for the sake of one huge power grab after another that's largely gone unchallenged, or at least unchallenged effectively though this could be more of my pessimism talking. Thankfully there aren't too many people being Karens about it all in my area but knowing they're out there can still be a drain, especially when people you know in fearmongering central report in. And yep, conspiracy theorist is the smear of the day, huh? Funny how I see more lefties screeching about Q in particular than I see righties actually buying into it. Also funny in a different way how appropriating that to mock them with "blue anon" got scrubbed off Urban Dictionary in a hurry...

    The mixed messaging on vaccines definitely isn't helping the trust issue either but I suspect that once enough states and corporations ram through vaccine passports that none of this is going to matter anyway. So far they've been able to get away with a lot more than I ever thought possible using Winnie as an excuse so why not keep pushing if you're in their position? I'm ready for these moral panics to be over and people to get a #$%&ing grip already... At least with 9/11 there was something solid and visceral to where you could see why things were going this way even if the long-term harm was visible. Winnie the Flu getting to this point is hard for me to wrap my head around, especially in light of how poor the media's credibility was at the time it all hit. Geil-Mann Amnesia on a nationwide scale maybe?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interview
Read more