Goodbye Twitter

I deactivated my Twitter account last week. I have grave concerns for the future of free speech in the United States. 

When I was young, the political left made a serious push to make hate speech illegal. They mostly failed, thanks to a robust First Amendment. But, they never gave up. 

I navigated speech codes in college, easily for the most part, because I wasn’t yet interested in politics, nor was I interested in offending anyone. 

I had one run in with the PC police (back before SJWs appeared). There was some question on campus as to my sexuality, and I found it greatly amusing to let it hang there. Upon determining I was straight, the campus lesbian (if you know what I mean) marched straight to the administration and demanded my scholarships be stripped away. I got off with writing a half-hearted mea culpa and continuing to be vague about my preferences. I did, in fact, date several girls in college and no boys, but I think the ambiguity was most of my allure.

I eventually graduated and so did the left. They are now getting corporations and social media to enact speech codes on everyone. They’ve circumvented government and enacted hate speech laws in the form of Terms of Service. 

And the First Amendment stalwarts of yesteryear cheered them on, with cries of “private business can do what they want.” One would wonder if they’d take it as far as murder if it weren’t for the same set issuing nearly the same defense when it comes to abortion. 

Never mind that most “private businesses” are in fact corporations. No, the argument I make is not that they are publicly traded—that’s a different sort of “public.” Rather, I point out that a corporation is a government-created entity. Private-schmivate. Corporations have scads of rules they must follow in order to be. What would be so untoward about making them also uphold the Constitution? 

The corporations are one thing. The mob is another. And they’re who I’m most concerned about. Right now, the corporations are most responsive to the mob, with “private entity” as their shield for taking the unjust actions demanded of them by the mob. In short, cancel culture. 

So, I retreat to my little blog, where no one will read what I have to say. Goodbye Twitter. 

Comments

  1. ArgentGaleMarch 11, 2021 at 6:05 PM

    Not nobody, tryanmax. I might have gotten rid of my Twitter ages ago but I did appreciate your thoughts here and there and HR 1 scares me to death too, especially given the high odds that it'll pass the Senate with the help of Romney and the others. I'm at a loss for...pretty much everything political anymore, really, and not seeing any good way out of this. Still, best of luck to you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. andToddsaidMarch 17, 2021 at 8:49 PM

    Thanks for popping in. Hope you’ll be around again. Hope this Against The People Act by some miracle fails.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ArgentGaleMarch 18, 2021 at 5:56 PM

    Of course. I've always found your takes on things at least as good as Andrew's over at Commentarama so it's nice to see you offering your takes elsewhere. Against the People indeed, or rather I think they used the wrong f-word in the title of that abomination, and you're right about what it's going to take to stop it. I wish I could offer some optimism there but as you know that's never been my strong suit even in much better political times. It says...something when a lot of the preppers and survivalists I know of aren't sounding so crazy anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  4. andToddsaidMarch 19, 2021 at 5:41 PM

    The wrong F word! I love it!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story ...
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interv...
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e...
Read more