Trump vs. Tester

Jon Tester, Democratic Senator from Montana, says it would have been a "dereliction of duty" for him not to investigate the accusation against Dr. Ronny Jackson. I agree with him and that’s why I also agree with President Trump that Tester should resign.


☤☤☤


What Tester did does not comport with what he himself claims his duty to be. Rather than investigate the claims in a serious fashion, he threw the untested accusations to the court of public opinion leaving Jackson and anyone supportive of him scrambling to respond.

☤☤☤

Jackson is a Navy Admiral and doctor who served three presidents as White House physician. He was Trump's pick to head the Veterans Affairs Administration. Jackson withdrew from consideration in the wake of the accusation publicized by Tester, which included allegations of drinking, over-prescribing drugs, and creating a hostile work environment.

☤☤☤

In the few days since Tester aired the rumors, it has come to light that Jackson has an unimpeachable record. Certain specific accusations were directly refuted by the Secret Service and the GSA. These refutations were so thorough as to cast complete doubt on all others.

☤☤☤

The duty that accompanies authority is a tightrope. On one hand, serious allegations of impropriety should not be ignored. On the other hand, frivolous ones absolutely should. It is up to the one in authority to exercise the necessary discretion.

☤☤☤

Tester has access to resources to examine the claims brought to him without a public brouhaha. He failed the test, so to speak. Oh, he got what he wanted—Jackson’s withdrawal—in dastardly fashion. But he’s been caught out as a base gossip.

☤☤☤

Trump is right that Tester should resign. Tester has shown himself derelict in his duties by his own standard. And should he fail to resign, the people of Montana should absolutely enforce resignation upon him this November.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interview
Read more