On Cults of Personality

from Twitter


It’s been amusing watching Tom defend this tweet for an hour, an obvious sign he stepped in it.



☀☀☀

Most definitions of a “cult of personality” cite the likes of Stalin, Mussolini, Mao, and the Kim Dynasty. While various scholars have attempted to apply the term to any number of US presidents, it is an obvious stretch.

☀☀☀

Tom’s definition of a cult of personality is when “their strongest supporters brook no criticism whatsoever” which aligns completely with what one expects of “strongest supporters.” In other words, he’s defining the term down to meaninglessness.

☀☀☀

Moreover, Tom casts a net wide enough to capture not only Trump, Obama, and HRC, but also Bob Dole. Imagine! A cult of personality minus the personality!

☀☀☀

Which brings me to my main point. Tom feels comfortable saying such outlandish things because he belongs to what I’ll call a cult of anti-personality. It’s a poor name, but I’ll explain what I mean.

☀☀☀

In a cult of personality, media portrays the figurehead in an idealized fashion, with a focus on shallow traits, in order to legitimize his rule. (This is obviously only part of what constitutes a CoP.)

☀☀☀

In the case of Trump, we have the near opposite: media portrays Trump as irredeemably flawed, the focus remains on shallow traits, but negative ones, with the purpose of delegitimizing his presidency.

☀☀☀

Tom is not only subscribed to the media-driven effort to demonize Trump, he has a personal hand in the disparagement. At the very least, by his own definition, it’s clear that Tom will brook no praise of Trump.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story ...
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interv...
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e...
Read more