Gorsuch: A Win-Win-Win-Win-Winning SCOTUS Pick

President Trump took the "win-win-win..." approach on his first SCOTUS pick. There's literally no downside to nominating Neil Gorsuch. If Gorsuch is approved by the Senate, then he replaces Antonin Scalia as a Constitutional originalist heir-apparent. If Democrats try to block such a qualified and uncontroversial appointment—and moreso if they succeed—they beclown themselves further than they already have in the last few weeks, (if that's even possible.) But that's wonk stuff that gets covered everywhere. The big win is how he caught everyone off guard.



Yesterday, like many others, I was still jabbing at Trump's flower-ceremony-like approach to his announcement for SCOTUS. After lots of long, drawn out teasing about the candidates on his list and how he was narrowing it down, Trump theatrically summoned both of his final candidates to Washington D.C. ahead of the official announcement. But a tweet from Sen. Ben Sasse helped me to see the drama for what it was.


A fill-in-the-blank protest sign! How desperate!

It shows that the protesters were truly caught off-guard. Normally, the rumor-mill figures out who the nominee is ahead of time. Little clues are dropped and, if nothing else, just watch for someone taking an unexpected trip to D.C. Trump managed to make the formal announcement into an actual announcement!

Their ability to use ready-made talking points was neutered and we were left with reactions to Gorsuch non-germane and ham-fisted. The best they had was to trot out the boring old saw that "originalist" means "pro-slavery" and "anti-woman." *Yawn!* As a perfect example, Sen Wyden of Oregon shat out this adorable gem:


In retrospect, I think Hardiman was a head-fake. His record can easily be summed up as "Law-and-Order" which Democrats always interpret as "oppress the blacks." He would've been an easy protest target and, I suspect without knowing, that's who the Dems were prepared for. But Trump zigged when they thought he'd zag! He put up the sane choice and the left was caught flat-footed.

Catching the opposition off-guard is win enough, but by picking Gorsuch, Trump has paved the way to the future. By making his first SCOTUS pick so soporifically conservative (in every sense of the term), Trump has taken for himself the politikraum to pick someone really interesting the next time a seat comes open.

Here's something noteworthy: As of this writing, searches for Ruth Bader Ginsburg are #14 on Google Trends. Apparently, she's giving a lecture at VMI, but I suspect that most people are checking to see how many ticks the old bird has left in her clock.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Image
It's not "ego." It's a claim that you encounter a lot—an insult really—that people are buying bigger and bigger trucks to compensate for… something. Here's one particularly cringeworthy example, because the person making it doesn't seem to realize the go-kart he's praising doesn't meet US emissions standards.  whenever americans say that they *need* a massive pickup truck that gets 12mpg just show them the Subaru Sambar utility vs. ego pic.twitter.com/NqexDbQcok — sam (@sam_d_1995) May 11, 2022 In response, a lot of people will defend their big truck purchase by saying they need a larger vehicle for their family, their business, or just because they like it. And to an extent, market forces are partly responsible for the increase in truck sizes, particularly when it comes to features like crew cabs. But it turns out that even a lot of people who like the big trucks don't know the full story of how their trucks got so big. The rest of the story
Read more

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

Also: Say hello to the “Sev-Con” There’s a NYTimes article out over the weekend that is all the buzz today. The pull-quote du jour is by former Mitt Romney strategist Mike Murphy, who told National Review in 2005 that Romney "is a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly." The preferred pick-apart is that this proves Romney will say and do anything to get elected. And, I admit, it certainly sounds damning. If nothing less, it was a poor choice of words. But this is old news. At the time Murphy issued a statement saying he had been misquoted. I’d say the facts support Murphy’s side of the story. The Times article tries to make more ado about Romney’s pro-life journey than there is. In 1994, when he ran against Ted Kennedy, he did not shy away from his personal opposition to abortion but positioned himself by saying “my personal beliefs, like the personal beliefs of other people, should not be brought into a political campaign.” He lost that race. In 2001, Romney e
Read more

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t

Image
The smear campaign against Cain continues   By now the internet, radio, television, and wagging tongues everywhere are all abuzz over the latest campaign blunder by Herman Cain. But is it really the gaffe everyone says it is? Or was it a selective editing job a la Ed Shultz ? Well, call me cynical, but I’ve seen enough media shenanigans to be suspicious of anything taken out of context and this definitely tripped my radar. In the clip that has gone viral (below), Cain does appear to be caught off-guard by a question on Libya, a topic he ought to have been ready for. My first reaction was to wonder how many clips like this land on editing room floors instead of online. In a world used to hyper-slick video and equally slick candidates, a moment of thought gathering can seem disastrous. Still, this isn’t about a some candidate’s “senior moment.” Rather, it is about a hatchet job gone awry. This clip was released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel along with the entire half-hour interview
Read more