Leftist Hand-Wringing over Giffords seat

Giffords could lose seat because of obscure statute

Follow the link to read the story if you like. I think the astute observer of the media can guess without looking what the hubub is all about. I haven't listened to the radio today, but I expect this to be the talk all over by tomorrow if it wasn't already today. While I am filled with compassion for Ms. Giffords and the other shooting-spree victims and their families, my observations on the story will be to-the-point:

First of all, in this case "obscure" means "a law Democrats don't like."

Second, the Washington Post (see the article) proves how obtuse it can be in wondering whether not casting votes for three months can actually constitute a vacancy.

Third, my response to Governor Symington: The provision was put in place precicely for cases such as this. If it weren't, there would be an exception for illness or injury, which would render the provision stupid. Also, in this case "injustice" means "the people of Arizona's 8th district being adequately represented in congress," see also, "justice."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Reason Why Are Trucks Getting Bigger

Romney’s Pro-Life Position Not So New

The Gaffe that Almost Wasn’t